I didn't exhaustively test every combination of settings and resolutions, but based on these results, I'm willing to state that yes, Diablo III runs better in Windows. last updated 13 April 2023 These games like Diablo will keep you warm until Diablo 4 brings you back to hell Comments (Image credit: Blizzard Entertainment) Looking for some excellent. With a 3D game-play view, this RPG will feel a little different than a Diablo play-through, but with some serious upshot.
(In the chart below, D means default settings, L means default settings with Low FX mode enabled and anti-aliasing off.) 1920× D 1920× L 2560× D 2560× L Set in a unique dark and unforgiving low-fantasy word, Exanima will speak loudly to those Diablo fans who appreciate the macabre throughout the series. Diablo is one of the most popular video game franchises of all time, not only in the hack-and-slash or RPG genre but overall as well. Low FXĬhanging the texture, shadow, physics, and clutter settings only had minor effects (at least on my machine), but I did notice a significant boost by disabling anti-aliasing and turning on the "Low FX" mode. I did a separate set of tests at this resolution as well. My 27" iMac's display has a native resolution of 2560 × 1440. The default/suggested video settings were the same on both platforms: I installed Diablo 3 in both OS X and Windows 7 and ran a few simple tests by loading up a character who was parked at the Act II starting area.
I have a Mid 2011, 27" iMac (Specifically, with a Core i5, 2.6GHz CPU and a Radeon HD 6770M graphics card). TL DR version: Yes, Diablo III runs better in Windows than in Mac OS X.
0 kommentar(er)
